Your photo is really good. The shallow DOF of the f/2.8 is perfect for letting through impression of softness and smoothness of baby skin. The sharp focus on the eye closer to the camera allows the viewer to connect to the child personality. I also like that you didn't show clothing and the lighting is great. Overall this is a really good portrait. Sorry, I cannot really find any useful critic. But if I were to be really picky maybe I would suggest trying this without the toy.

Nice framing, nice crop! I would try recovering the highlights a bit to bring more 3D volume to the smoke, and perhaps try saturating more the red tones and the green tones to make the car and the vegetation pop-out a bit more.

This image looks really great! I am really impressed with the quality using a super-zoom. The cloud formation looks like a painting and the dark grey goes really well with the red and white of the tower. I also like that you did frame the tower a little off-center. Good job!

I love the picture, it is really a very good work indeed, but this frame... hmm... I guess that shadow going up is a bit annoying. Usually one would expect the shadow to go down-right, not up-right. Also, the offset of the shadow should be more proportional to its fuzziness -- so I would either move the shadow closer to the photo or maybe make it fuzzier. But better than fixing the shadow, I would suggest to drop this shadow frame out and have at most a thin black line or maybe even nothing.

Great composition Nebojsa! My only comment is that perhaps I would prefer to boost the dynamic range a bit, mainly recovering the shadow areas in order to bring up the details of branches and the ripples of water a bit. TFS.

Hi Roberto, I agree with fransx about the wall on the right, I would have removed that. But this is still a great shot! TFS.

I really like the DOF, the colors and the angle, from a lower point of view. This shot is an example of how important it is to remember to move vertically sometimes. Also, a little wider aperture and you would blur the background too much, a little less and you would loose the nice blur. Your choice of focal length was also very appropriate for the scene, giving just the right perspective. TFS!

Very nice image. I really like the space and the perspective. Please notice the white spot on the top left corner. I guess you would need to crop a little bit more from the top. On the post processing I would have tried to recover the highlights a bit to have more details on the lamps. I also reduce the temperature a bit because the shot is a little bit too yellow to my taste. About framing, if I could move the furniture a tiny bit I would have tried to align better that one little couch near the window. If I could interfere and interact with the guests I would also move two of them to those couches that are facing the camera, but of course that would make it more difficult to get the shot to look casual. Thanks for sharing!

Hi Scott. This is a very nice shot. I specially like how the circle at the top is almost perfectly round in the image. On the other hand I agree with szekelykristof about the symmetry. My criticism is with the fact that the tower is not tilted or asymmetric enough to claim it was done on purpose, but still noticeable because it is almost symmetric and almost straight. So I guess I would choose either to go for the symmetry and try the most perfect framing or go for the tilt + asymmetry in a more obvious, dramatic angle. Thanks for sharing!

Great shot! I just think that if it was me I would have done the post processing in a different way. I would have recovered the highlights and the shadows quite a bit to show the volume in the water falls and to show the green in the leafs around the frame and then I would increase saturation and play a tiny bit with the color temperature. But I guess this is just a matter of taste. TFS!