Budapest

Critiques [Translate]

•      
• jafsc (4621)
• [2005-10-24 19:12]

Bonjour Serge, j'essai de concerter le titre de ta photographie avec le thème que tu nous presentes. Je ne le vois pas. Je n'ai jamais été à Budapest et le sujet ne le représente pas...
Techniquement imho (in my humble opinion :))je la trouve discrètement sur-exposée, avec beaucoup d'éléments de distraction et un lourdeur dans la composition.Peut-être avec un post-proccess cela pourrait s'arranger. J'espère ce commentaire sera bien reçu, je te le donne dans un but absolument constructif..
José

•      
• Attila (0)
• [2005-11-19 20:11]

This is pretty amazing; I recognized this graffiti because I have seen it on the Internet! Check this out: woostercollective... The guy who painted it is proud of having been able to get that high up to create this graffiti. He admits that his style would not yield too many points... Makes me think... Just before Picasso, many people defined "art" as something that is so "nice" that it would be "difficult" for the average person to make. About when Picasso appeared, many criticised him because he drew and painted things that people thought they could do themselves. Picasso took the "difficulty" out of art. Looks like these graffiti guys, especially the breed that takes pride in painting difficult-to-access surfaces, are actually pretty conservative: much of their pride comes from the fact that their work was difficult to make, regardless whether it looks like anything or whether it expresses anything else than "I have been able to get up here". Sorry, just rambling about the aesthetics of graffiti...

(Sorry, no points left today.)