Praid

Critiques [Translate]

•  
• eyusuf (414)
• [2008-06-13 8:54]

i like the idea; however, it seems to me that you dont give us enough room to contemplate on the pic. maybe move back a little bit and capture more head and back of the person, while keeping the hands in focus? or maybe move a little back to the side to capture more of the hands?

•  
• zebulus (0)
• [2008-06-13 9:05]

A nice thought behind the image, but the execution is lacking my friend.

When I first looked at it I was wondering what it was of because the focus is sooo poor, but then I saw the hands.

I understand that is the "focus" of the image, but I think more needs to be in focus though, otherwise its almost indescernable what the image is of.

Sorry

•  
• jonathanhart (15811)
• [2008-06-13 14:13]

hope you don't mind, but i agree that the hands are a minor detail, and so much blur.. difficult to find this shot wonderful, but the idea is interesting
regards
jo

•  
• tlacoyoweb (802)
• [2008-06-14 4:10]

Bueno, no puedo estar mas en desacuerdo con los comentarios anteriores que quieren todo definido o una mayor definicion en la imagen. Me parece que la idea sel enfoque selectivo es interesante y util, aunque creo que pierde efectividad en esta toma tal vez por la composicion o punto de vista que se adopto. Si este es el enfoque selectivo a 1.7 de tu Sears esta muy bien trabajado. Un poco mas abierta la imagen mejoraria bastante la comprension de la imagen. Saludos :)

•  
• guava (743)
• [2008-06-14 11:45]

hola, Luis!

yo no estoy de acuerdo con zebulus. el simplemente no entiendio lo sensual que esta imagen es. en lo que toca al foco es un uso bastante profesional. muy buen trabajo.

con respeto,
Lena