Yeah, this is a hard one Lisa! Really hard, hmmmmm I would have had to walk around a bit for a more extreme angle, maybe straight up? Maybe wait until the sun was in front of the building? morning time? I love the building, nice and sharp! Love the blue and white. A bit of OE in the sky. Hmmmm....Gotta have light from the other angle, for me! How is ya??
B-)
linda
Well Lisa, a good picture no doubt , but it's a pity the top left is devoid of blue sky or clouds , white on white isn 't so appealing , other than that it's as good as any architecture shot , i like the modern lines and shape of the facade with its two central parts projecting into opposite directions , kind of unusual but at the same time functional i think ,
Perhaps some colouring Lisa , it sure would bring contrast to this area of your frame , nonetheless the clarity is superb as is sharpness and your composition is fine , i like the blue of the windows to touch and terminate its sequence at the edges of the frame ,perhaps more blue on the right side like one more set of windows to balance the view but frankly Lisa i have seen much worse than this , not a bad looking shot at all ,
Take care,
Carol
I like the purity of the shot as you've captured it, I have to say. I honestly wouldn't know how better - or how else - to take this shot.
Simple, eyecatching - nice work.
Rew
Hi, Lisa -
This building is a great find - reminds me somehow of some of Gaudi's architecture in Spain with the disorienting curves. It's a bit bright overall but not really OE, I think. I like how you framed it and it's nice and sharp. Hope all is well -
Hello Lisa,
This is the sort of building which is crying out to be captured! The contrasting curves, the contrasting tones, the alternating lines, horizontals, verticals, diagonals - this has them all!
I like your composition and sharp details.
Kind regards,
Bev :-)
Hello Lisa,
Do you know that there is software that enables you to correct lens distorsion? All those curved lines! ;o)))
Interesting building, really, and you show us an interesting part of it, but I think the impact of your photo would be stronger if:
- you achieved to get rid of the over-exposure in the sky;
- you got the horizontal lines really horizontal;
- you showed less of the building in order to convey more of its architectural "spirit". As you show us only a detail, I think there are still too much things to be seen.
I have done a WS to show you what I mean.
And, of course, feel free to (dis)agree ;o).
TFS & kind regards,
Erik
![Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 3979 W: 1083 N: 10876]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-g-g.gif)
(47950)
![Gold Star Critiquer/Silver Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 532 W: 37 N: 887]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-s-g.gif)
(4294)