| |||||||||||||||||||||
Mirage or Duke | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
![Gold Star Critiquer/Silver Workshop Editor [C: 524 W: 49 N: 1]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-s-n.gif){kind=small}
Critiques [Translate]
![Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 1968 W: 106 N: 2574]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-g-g.gif){kind=small}
Hi Estaban...This shot could have been sharper but I have great feelings for the Duke...I owned one for a year from 1990 to 91...flew it about 300 every expensive hours. This plane is Fast and was very dangerous before the advent of Vortex Generators (which mine did not have)...very poor glide ratio, very fast landing speed and required a lot of runway in hot weather...if an engine failure occurred on take off (before VG's) you could almost not recover....anyway a beautiful artistic plane which was the sexiest twin on the market.
Roger
- abidin
![Silver Star Critiquer/Silver Note Writer [C: 45 W: 0 N: 17]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/s-n-s.gif)
(244) - [2009-08-31 3:23]
Hi Esteban, nice try but this shot looks more perfect if looks clear any how waiting to see more and one more thing nice POV.
Regards,
Tahseen
| Calibration Check | |||||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F |