hi,
sorry to contact you via here, but the TL contact option is out of limit for today.
janice Dunn told me that you have (she borrowed it from you before) L 70-200mm f/2.8 IS lens.
I have f/4 non IS.
And thinking of upgrading to F/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS, f/2.8 IS too expensive.
Is the IS worth it?
Mind you I've taken shots with 70-300mm lens before w/o tripod, straight from the hand at full focal length and no problems with sharpness etc.
So i was just thinking if IS would come in handy in my case, or would be it better to get a fast lens, i.e. f/2.8.
Not sure if you have some comparison with the model i have.
Thnx for any help
Tom |
Slovakia
Kristinka (32) *
stevkds
![Gold Star Critiquer/Silver Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 397 W: 25 N: 194]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-s-g.gif) (1612) |
![Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor [C: 770 W: 147 N: 584]](http://i1.treklens.com/misc/g-g-n.gif){kind=small}